• About me

From Middletown to the Middle East

~ Reflections on travel and teaching

From Middletown to the Middle East

Tag Archives: religion in the united states

My religion and politics course so far

29 Wednesday Aug 2012

Posted by tgilheany in Courses

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

religion and israel, Religion and politics course, religion in the united states, teaching

Below is an unfinished syllabus for my religion and politics class. To date I’ve designed four units: 1. introductory provocative questions, 2. religion and U.S. politics, 3. religion and the U.S. president and 4. religion and the State of Israel. I’m working on units on the Arab Spring, on religion and state in Europe, and on religion and state in Afghanistan, Pakistan and India.

Any ideas are welcome! You can also download it here.

Religious Studies VI: Religion and Politics in the Contemporary World

2012-2013

Question: How do, and should, people’s religious beliefs and practices influence their political beliefs and practices? How do, and should, their political views inform their religious commitments?

How to read this syllabus

 

Day #__          Today’s Question

Homework to be completed for this class appears here

Additional notes about what we will do in class appear here.

 

Religion and Politics: A taste of a few debates

Day 1   To what extent does religion effect politics, and vice versa: the case of territory.

Please read Terence Gilheany, ed. “Blog Entries on The Land is Ours.”

In class we will discuss the religious claim some settlers claim to the West Bank / Judea and Samaria. Are these religious claims invalid on their face? Why? What would counterarguments look like?

Day 2   To what extent does religion effect politics, and vice versa: the case of forced conversion

Please read Jacques Fornier, “Confession of Baruch the Jew.”

In class we will discuss: what can society do to avoid such tragedies? What precisely are the problems at issue in an institution like the Inquisition?

Day 3   To what extent should believers seek to rule by their beliefs?

Please read Augustine of Hippo, “Religion and Politics (TFGed).”

In class we will discuss: is Augustine justified in advocating that the Roman Empire support Christianity?

Day 4   When does fear of religious domination turn into prejudice?

Please read Thomas J. Heflin, “Warning Against the Roman Catholic Party.”

Is Heflin prejudiced? To what extent is his concern legitimate? What should be done with Heflin’s attitude?

Day 5   When should states defend individual rights against religious rights?

Caitlin Killian, “Five French Women Debate the Veil.”

Does France encourage an open society or prejudice when it bans the veil from schools? How would a caring society approach this question?

Day 6   How do we define religion? How do we define politics?

Please read Swanson, “Religion and Politics definitions.” Then please write a 300 word essay finishing the statement “The biggest reason religion and politics come into conflict is…”

Please submit the “why religion and politics conflict” essay.

What should the relationship be between religion and politics in the United States?

Day 7   What critiques might religious conservatives level at liberals? To what extent can and should the “culture wars” be reduced?

Please read Patrick Buchanan, “1992 Republican National Convention Speech” and EJ Dionne, “Culture War Treaty.” (2007).

To what extent is Buchanan right when he claims, “There is a religious war going on in our country for the soul of America”? Is there a “third way” as Dionne references, or would that require one side to surrender their religious beliefs?

Day 8   What are the concerns and interests of the “religious right” in the United States?

Please read Jane Mayer, “Bully Pulpit” (2012).

To what extent does the Christian Reconstructionist movement in general, and Bryan Fischer in particular, represent the true values of the United States? What aspects, if any, of liberal American religiosity are they omitting or misunderstanding?

Day 9   What critiques might religious liberals level at conservatives?

Please read Scott Appleby, “A Mormon-Catholic Ticket?” (2012) and Alice Chasan, “Why ‘Faith-based Diplomacy’ Matters” (2006).

To what extent do religious liberals like Madeline Albright and Scott Appleby represent the true values of the United States? What aspects, if any, of conservative American religiosity are they omitting or misunderstanding?

Day 10 What did the U.S. founding fathers say about the role of religion in politics?

Please read Thomas Jefferson, “Virginia Bill for Religious Freedom” (1786), Benjamin Franklin, “Letters about his Religious Views” (1780 & 1790), U.S. Continental Congress, “The Declaration of Independence” (1776), and U.S. Congress, “The First 10 Amendments To The Constitution As Ratified By The States” (1791). In the Amendments, please focus simply on the establishment and free exercise clauses of the first amendment.

To what extent do you hear more conservative or liberal stances towards religion and politics in these documents?

Day 11What are the advantages and disadvantages of an Enlightenment view of religion and politics?

Please read John Locke, “A Letter Concerning Toleration” (1689).

Should even a Christian dedicated to saving souls accept that such salvation should not be the task of government?

Day 12 How strong a version of seperation of church and state do we support?

Please write a 300-word essay interpreting the Establishment clause of the First Amendment. Some options: 1. Government should not make one form of Christianity the official religion, but should actively support Christianity in preference to other religions or to nonbelief. 2. Government should not make any religion the official religion, but should actively support religion in preference to nonbelief. 3. Government should not make any religion the official religion and should not support religion in preference to nonbelief. 4. Another stance that you hear in the Establishment clause.

 Please submit the “Establishment clause” essay.

What limitations, if any, should we place on the President’s religious beliefs?

Day 13 Why do so many care that the President be a Christian?

Please read Cathy Lynn Grossman, “Obama, Romney Share Their Christian Views” (2012), Luke Johnson, “Robert Jeffress: Mormonism Is A Cult, But A ‘Theological Cult’” and Michelle Geller, “Why So Many People Think Obama Is A Muslim.”

In class we will discuss why people are invested in the President being a Christian, what the results of this might be, and our views.

Day 14 Who counts as a Christian?

Please read Michael Otterson, “How do Mormons answer ‘non-Christian’ claims?” and Mason, “I’m a Mormon, Not a Christian.”

In class we will discuss questions people have about Mormons, ideas about what Romney’s Mormon identity have triggered in portions of the U.S. population.

Day 15 Why assert that Barak Obama is not a Christian?

Please read Pew, “Little Voter Discomfort with Romney’s Mormon Religion; Only About Half Identify Obama as Christian”

In class we will watch Barack Obama, “Call to Renewal Keynote Address.”

Day 16 To what extent is there a “stained-glass ceiling” in U.S. politics?

Please read Z. Byron Wolf, “Stained-Glass Ceiling- Would America Vote for a Non-Christian?

In class we will discuss to what extent voting for someone whose beliefs are similar to yours aligns with the spirit of democracy?

Day 17 What is the history of concerns about the President’s religion?

Please read Jay Dolan, “The Right of a Catholic To Be President” (2008).

In class we will watch John F. Kennedy, “Address to the Greater Houston Ministerial Association.”

Day 18 What limits should the electorate place on the Presidents’ religion?

Please write a 300-word essay discussing the following fictional scenario: an organization called “Righteous Way” works to ensure that as many politicians are, in their words, “Bible-believing Christians.” They have funded attacks on Jewish, Muslim, Catholic, and Mormon candidates, as well as on Protestant candidates they judged not to be Bible-believing. How would you respond to this group? Would you sue them, asking the courts to limit their activities? Would you donate to an alternative group? Would you donate to this group? Other? Why?

Please submit the “Christian President” essay.

Religion and the State in contemporary Israel

Day 19 How do the founding principles of Israel regarding religion compare to the founding principles of the United States?

Please read Provisional Government of Israel, “Proclamation of Independence” and Israeli Knesset, “Basic Law – Human Dignity and Liberty”

In class we will discuss the concepts of “complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants irrespective of religion,” “freedom of religion,” and “a Jewish and democratic state.”

Day 20 How do the settlements relate to the State  of Israel and its values?

Please read Daniel Byman and Natan Sachs, The Rise of Settler Terrorism

In class we will discuss what the settlements are and some of the initial questions they raise for the relationship of Judaism to the State of Israel.

Day 21 To what extent is religion at the heart of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?

Maxine Dovere, “A Prominent Rabbi’s Take on Jewish Christian relations” (2012) and Rabbi Eliezar Melamed, “In the Merit of Six Houses.”

In class we will discuss the concept of the land and of redemption in both Jewish and Christian Zionism, as well as the secular defense of the settler movement.

Day 22 To what extent is religion at the heart of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?

Please read Dani Dayan, “Israel’s Settlers Are Here to Stay” (2012) and and Benjamin Weinthal, “German Jewish leader – Rescind Israel hater’s prize” (2012).

In class we will discuss the secular defense for the settler movement.

Day 23 To what extent is religion at the heart of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?

Please read Judith Butler, “I affirm a Judaism that is not associated with state violence” (2012) and Avelett Shani, “The West Bank’s Rabbi Menachem Froman has the solution to the conflict” (2012).

In class we will discuss the idea of a Judaism that advocates Israeli withdrawal from the Occupied Territories.

Day 24 To what extent is religion at the heart of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?

Please write a 300-word essay on the question “Is it possible for Israel to be both Jewish and democratic? If not, what changes would you recommend? If yes, address the objections we have encountered in this unit.

Please submit the “Jewish and Democratic” essay.

The Arab Spring

Day 25 What

Please read

In class

Secularization and religious diversity in Europe

Day 26 What

Please read

In class

Religion and the states of Afghanistan, Pakistan, and India

Day 27 What

Please read

In class

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Tumblr
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • Print
  • Email
  • Pinterest

Like this:

Like Loading...

Religion in U.S. Presidential Elections

27 Tuesday Mar 2012

Posted by tgilheany in Fulbright project

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Al Smith, America House, Barak Obama, Colin Powell, Establishment Clause, Free Exercise Clause, John F. Kennedy, Mitt Romney, no religious test clause, religion in the united states, Rick Santorum

The following is a talk I gave this evening at America House, whose mission is “to encourage a dialogue between the United States and Jerusalemites in order to foster mutual understanding and emphasize shared values.” I spoke on the role of religion in U.S. presidential elections. As perhaps can be seen in my talk, I expected a small gathering of a high school or university students. Instead, I spoke to two NGO directors, three professors, and the head of a major Islamic endowment. It was exciting and a bit intimidating. We had a half-hour discussion afterwards, which I hope they continue without the need for it to be constantly translated for me into English, which slowed down the conversation some!

I’d like to begin by thanking the entire America House team, and especially Christine and Nada, for inviting me this evening. In my life in the United States I teach comparative religions in a private high school, and this year I have been on sabbatical doing research. I miss the classroom, and I am excited for our conversation this evening. Also, my work this year has been focused on Palestinian and Israeli teachers, and I welcome the opportunity to reflect a bit on my home country.

As we think about the role of religion in United States Presidential elections, allow me to begin with a quote from the United States Bill of Rights. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” The Founders of the United States placed this statement in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as they recognized the diversity of religious belief within the U.S. colonies and the difficulty they would have keeping those colonies unified if they established one faith as the official religion of the new United States. After all, whose religion would it be? Would it be the Puritanism of New England, the Catholicism of Maryland, the Quakerism of Pennsylvania or the Anglicanism of Virginia? In the 1600s Europe had torn itself apart in religious wars, and the Founders felt that too close an intermingling of religion and politics was dangerous. Not only, did they reason, could it cause political instability, it also was bad for religion itself. As Thomas Jefferson argued, religious coercion “tends also to corrupt the principles of that very religion it is meant to encourage.” The Founders also specified that elected officials should not be required to be of any religion. They wrote, “No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.” At the same time, the United States was, and remains today, a very religious country. Currently 92% of Americans say they believe in God, and 65% say that religion is important in their daily lives, compared to a 38% average across the developed world. Religion plays a far larger role in political debates in the United States than it does in many other Western democracies. There thus arises in American political life a perceived tension between many citizens’ personal religiosity and their desire to maintain freedom of worship for themselves and their neighbors. This manifests itself in the way Americans think of their Presidential candidates. Each person wants a candidate who reflects his or her values. At what point does supporting a candidate who reflects one’s values, including one’s religious values, shade into applying a religious test?

In earlier times, in the age before radio, television and the Internet, many presidents’ personal religious beliefs were not as intense a subject of discussion as they are today. In the 20th and 21st centuries, however, they have become the source of political debate. In 1928 a Catholic, New York Governor Al Smith, ran for president and encountered a good deal of resistance on the basis of his religion. Some believed he would obey the Pope and not pursue the interests of the United States. This concern combined with anti-Catholic prejudice more widely, and with an hostility to immigrants. Many historians argue it was a central reason for Smith’s loss of the election.

In 1960 a second Catholic candidate ran for president and the accusation of divided loyalties arose again. Former senator John F. Kennedy of Massachusetts addressed the issue head-on, speaking to a group of Protestant ministers who had expressed skepticism. “I am not the Catholic candidate for president. I am the Democratic Party’s candidate for president, who happens also to be a Catholic. I do not speak for my church on public matters, and the church does not speak for me. Whatever issue may come before me as president — on birth control, divorce, censorship, gambling or any other subject — I will make my decision in accordance with these views, in accordance with what my conscience tells me to be the national interest, and without regard to outside religious pressures or dictates. And no power or threat of punishment could cause me to decide otherwise. But if the time should ever come — and I do not concede any conflict to be even remotely possible — when my office would require me to either violate my conscience or violate the national interest, then I would resign the office; and I hope any conscientious public servant would do the same.”

 Some hear in such principles a test that means that religious people can’t run for president. Recently, former Senator Rick Santorum, another Catholic and a current candidate for the Republican nomination for president, critiqued Kennedy’s speech, going so far as to say it made him “sick to his stomach.” Senator Santorum argued, “What kind of country do we live in that says only people of non-faith can come into the public square and make their case?” Others note, however, that government neutrality toward religion is not the same as excluding religious people from public office. President Obama, when a Senator in 2006, argued, “Whatever we once were, we are no longer just a Christian nation; we are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, a Buddhist nation, a Hindu nation, and a nation of nonbelievers…Democracy demands that the religiously motivated translate their concerns into universal, rather than religion-specific, values. It requires that their proposals be subject to argument, and amenable to reason.”

This last statement is subtle and requires some unpacking. Let’s say that a lawmaker deeply believes that, because that is God’s will, we should tax the rich more heavily and support the poor more directly. That is absolutely his right to believe that. In order to convince others in a society with many different kinds of belief, however, he cannot simply argue that redistribution of wealth is the revealed word of God. He must argue that it will benefit many, that the advantages of his plan will outweigh the disadvantages, and that it will be practical to implement. Notice the lawmaker is still a believer, motivated by his beliefs. He is speaking in a language, however, that people of many faiths or none at all can also speak.

The worry that a president will defer to his religion’s leaders rather than take the best action for the country has been raised again in this election cycle. Mitt Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts and at the moment the frontrunner in the Republican primary race, is a Mormon. Mormonism, a relatively new Christian denomination that began in the United States, believes in scriptures revealed in the 19th century. Most important for our discussion, however, like Roman Catholicism it has a single hierarchy. A conservative Christian pastor who supports another candidate claimed recently that Mormonism is not a true religion but a cult. Romney responded by citing the U.S. Constitution, saying, “The founders of this country went to great lengths to make sure and even put in the Constitution, that we would not choose people who represent us in government based on their religion.”

As Americans continue to evolve in their understanding of faith and the presidency, when will we see the first president from a world religion other than Christianity? The election of Barack Obama shows that common wisdom about what biases govern the typical U.S. voter can be very wrong. Still, a portion of the U.S. electorate does remain prejudiced against people of different faiths. Anti-Jewish and anti-Muslim sentiments, for example, have decreased sharply but still influence some voters, particularly older voters. In the 2008 election, for example, opponents of Barack Obama tried to use the claim that he was Muslim to turn voters against him. The attempt failed. As former Secretary of State Colin Powell, a Republican, countered, “Well, the correct answer is, he is not a Muslim, he’s a Christian. He’s always been a Christian. But the really right answer is, what if he is? Is there something wrong with being a Muslim in this country? The answer’s no, that’s not America. Is there something wrong with some seven-year-old Muslim-American kid believing that he or she could be president? This is not the way we should be doing it in America.”

The United States has an increasingly diverse religious representation in government. In 2000 the Democratic vice-presidential nominee was Jewish. The first Muslim member of congress was elected in 2007, and there are now two Muslims serving in the congress. 2007 also saw the election of the first two Buddhist representatives, and a long serving congressman became the first openly atheist member. While no Hindu has yet been elected to congress, a Hindu priest has offered prayers at the opening of a Congressional session.

To summarize, then, Americans are a religious people, who have been becoming more tolerant of their fellow citizens who worship in a broad spectrum of faiths, or follow no faith at all. While some resistance remains, the number of Americans who say they would refuse to vote for an otherwise well-qualified candidate based on his religion has been in decline across the 20th and into the 21st century. From time to time specific issues with religious implications arise in presidential elections. Candidates on the political right are currently more likely to directly appeal to the religiosity of their voters than those on the political left. As Robert Putnam points out in the most recent edition of Foreign Affairs magazine (and I recommend his article) this has not always been the case. For candidates across the political spectrum, acknowledging religious faith of some kind remains important, while religious exclusivism seems to be more damaging than advantageous to presidential candidates.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Tumblr
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • Print
  • Email
  • Pinterest

Like this:

Like Loading...

Recent posts…

  • Jericho – my good and bad calls
  • Evidence of support – plaques but little else
  • Skirting Jerusalem
  • Ibrahimi mosque/Machpelech cave
  • Dr. Hasan

Days gone by

  • July 2022
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • March 2019
  • August 2018
  • March 2016
  • July 2015
  • November 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • November 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011

Enter your email address to follow my adventures in Jerusalem and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Blogroll

  • A Year On My wife’s blog – a more literate and incisive view of our time abroad…

Search

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • From Middletown to the Middle East
    • Join 28 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • From Middletown to the Middle East
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: